frankolauro ha scritto:
Il Dabbing alla fine gli si è ritorto contro.
L'analisi tecnica dice che ha vinto la squadra con più esperienza (Miller, Thomas, Ware, Manning) e che è rimasta il più possibile fedele al gameplan iniziale. L'OL dei Panthers, più che Newton stesso (che ha lanciato bene quando la linea l'ha protetto), è stata imbarazzante.
Mi ricollego postando l'articolo in cui fondamentalmente si analizza il successo di Denver tramite spiegazione di Wade Phillips
Another crucial benefit of green-dog blitzing is it prevents those extra blockers from doing what they’re employed specifically to do, which is help the offensive line. Tight end Ed Dickson can’t help heavy-legged right tackle Mike Remmers with a double team on Von Miller if Dickson has to react to a safety coming after his quarterback. Fullback Mike Tolbert can’t lend a hand to slower-footed Michael Oher against DeMarcus Ware if a linebacker has suddenly pinned his ears back and is rushing.
And often, the Panthers like to have Dickson and Tolbert blocking on the same side so that the entire O-line can slide the other way. By green dog blitzing, that O-line slide gets nullified because the green-dog blitzers become the edge rushers, allowing the D-lineman to run twists and stunts just a few slots over against the sliding blockers.
With this proactive approach, the Broncos turned in one of the most dominant Super Bowl performances in history. The Panthers offense scored a season-low in points (10) and gave up season-highs in turnovers (four) and sacks (seven).